iPhone? iPhooey!

Modern Marketing, Popular Culture, Society, Uncategorized 5 Comments

I understand fanaticism.

As a kid, it was a footy team - my beloved Subiaco. In those days, the WAFL was all-consuming in Perth. The match of the day would draw 25,000+. A grand final 50,000 - these were the days of the outer, where you’d have to stand all day, wedged vertical like pencils in a quiver case because it was too packed to sit down. Subi games didn’t often draw big crowds, though. The Mighty Maroons, as they were known then, customarily languished at, or near, the bottom of the ladder. But my father, brother and I, and perhaps a mate or two as we got older, would religiously attend week after week and barrack ourselves hoarse, and when a win came it was joyous - it would make your week.

It was the losses, though, that were the real measure of supporter character. Year after year, there’d be that game - the long trip out to Bassendean Oval where the Swan Districts supporters occupied their covered home stand on the wing, and ne’er a more one-eyed pack of footy terrorists has scorched God’s earth.

We’d sit on the weathered grey wooden benching on the opposite wing, feeble straws leaning into the roaring hurricane of cheers, cries, rebukes and admonitions that were unleashed with every kick, mark, handball, tackle, shirtfront (them were the days). More often than not, it wasn’t only a metaphorical hurricane we braved on those bleak winter trials at Bassendean. It was uncanny how often those afternoons were the dirtiest a Perth winter could chuck up. Only a Subi supporter of that era understands what it took to front up at Bassendean year after year with the rain squalling into your face, infiltrating your raincoat so you were wet through by quarter time and shivering in the chill for the rest of the game, urging on the Mighty Maroons as Swans tore them apart and their rampant tribe stamped and hooted and radiated mayhem and murder from their stand, baying for more blood, more, more!

As a teenager, my fanaticism switched to rock music. And Jeanette. She was my first date. Far more than that, she was my Catherine (Wuthering Heights was another of my obsessions), the unwitting object of my ludicrously extreme romantic fantasies for two years before I found the guts to issue her a stammering phone invitation to the school social, which she foolishly accepted.

I bored her fine arse off all night discussing the Top 40. Well, not discussing. Shouting in her ear (and inhaling the scent of her hair, as it tingled against my cheek). The band - Aquarius - was loud. Gloriously loud. I assumed poor Jeanette would be as enthralled as I over analysing why Three Dog Night had moved up 15 places in a week with a shithouse song while Creedence hadn’t budged. Or determining whether Aquarius’s drummer had inserted an extra roll in the chorus of the 1910 Fruitgum Company’s One Two Three Red Light. Actually, did you know, Jeanette, that the 1910 Fruitgum Company has gone heavy? There’s only one original member left, and he was never into bubblegum and…she wasn’t enthralled.

Thankfully, my social sensibilities and musical taste developed (although my relationship with Jeanette did not - at least, not outside my cranium). I saw almost every international and Eastern States rock act that made it to Perth - including many I didn’t much care for (eg: Elton John, Santana, Rick Wakeman). My first concert was thrilling: Deep Purple, Free, Manfred Mann, Chain on the same bill at Beatty Park. Two years later, the legendary Led Zeppelin concert at Subi Oval that was so loud it drew complaints from City Beach. Disappointing Creedence the week after. Garry Glitter, Lou Reed, Blackfeather, Suzi Quatro, Focus, Supernaught, Donovan, Captain Matchbox, The Rolling Stones, AC/DC with Bon Scott at the Sandgroper pub in Leederville, the marvellous first incarnation of Split Enz, who blew Zappa away at the WACA…

I spent all my money on concerts, records, hi-fi, and guzzling beer at the rock barns that were youth meccas in Perth in the 70s. Oh, and dope. Needless to say.

I was there at the beginning of punk in Perth, an initiate, and an inspirational time that was - see www.perthpunk.com for the full story in obsessive detail. This was when my rock fanaticism peaked. I would have camped outside the Entertainment Centre overnight - over two or three nights, whatever it took - to see Patti Smith, or The Ramones, or Iggy, or Television. None of them made it to Perth during that time. But The Ramones gigged in Adelaide. A small group of Perth devotees drove across the Nullarbor to see them. I found out after the event. Otherwise, I would have joined them.

So yes, I understand fanaticism.

But what the hell is all this iPhone 3G shit about? Queuing for days to see an artist or band, I can get. Or overnight to get good Grand Final seats. A great concert stays with you for life. As does the enveloping fragrance of your first love’s hair. A Grand Final win is the culmination of years of hope and yearning, the realisation of a cherished dream, glorious and transient (and therein lies its preciousness). But a phone? One that will still be available the next day, next week, next month? And superseded the month after that! WTF?

Maybe this iPhone 3G is something special, unique in the history of phones? So in an effort to understand, I researched it. It plays music and videos. Uh huh. So it replaces that terribly inconvenient MP3 player that is so light and tiny it will fit on your key ring. And what a bonus it must be to squint at videos on a miniscule LCD screen on yer mobile. But there’s more.

It’s internet and email capable. Uh huh. Just like your computer, but not as good, then? And forgive me, but PDAs have been around a while now, haven’t they? Oh, but this one, you can phone people on. Which you can already do on your $50 mobile.

Wait…it’s got a camera - by all accounts a crappy one, just like on any number of cheap mobiles that have been around forever.

So, let’s make sure we’ve got this right. The iPhone 3G doesn’t do anything new. It simply combines features that have been in common use on other devices for years, and as with any all-in-one setup, with compromised quality. And has the Apple spunk appeal. THAT’S IT?!

So is this an Apple thing?

My first puter was a Mac. I bought into that Mac cult hoohah for a while. Then it dawned on me that Macs were far less convenient than PCs because of all the file compatibility issues.

My next computer was a PC. No more problems opening files. And that stuff you hear from Macphiles about the Windows OS being so much more difficult to find your way around - well, maybe with Windows 95, but not now. Mac OS’s are not better than Windows. They both work fine; one is as simple (or difficult) as the other. It’s simply a matter of what you’re used to.

Mac maniacs are usually, in my experience at least, music recording buffs, artists or academics. Understandable. Mac was once state of the art for graphics and music. Now though, the gap has narrowed to, oh, around zero. As for the academics…well, Mac cornered the academic market computer-eons ago - little wonder the eggheads have remained loyal when they’ve known nothing else. They’ve always been a bit dozey and staid. Besides, they like to think of themselves as beings of superior taste, and Apple has positioned itself adroitly to pamper the egos of snobs, cultivating an image of sophistication, innovation, aesthetic flair, radicalism. And their oh-so-sophisticated devotees have chomped down on that juicy bait campaign after campaign. And still they blame PCs when they can’t open those pesky files that somehow still undermine Apple’s 100% compatibility guarantees.

So are the mobs huddled outside Telstra and Optus in the early hours waiting to grab an iPhone 3G all musos, artists and academics? Nope. Mac computer fanatics are cultists. This iPhone movement is way too mainstream for them.

So what is it? Apart from a marketing coup and fucking stupid?

Who knows? A symptom of communal emptiness, perhaps? People seeking something to look forward to? To belong to? (Ye shall know me by my iPhone).

Is it some badge of social standing, like designer clothes and lux cars and living in a hip suburb?

Or is it simply brilliant hype at its most potent in an environment of compulsive brainless consumerism? Merely another symptom of the affluenza epidemic?

Well, I dunno, but I couldn’t avoid the sense that something’s really rotten in the state of Denmark when I read an online report of some fuckwit 3rd in the queue outside Optus’ Sydney store booking a room at the nearby Four Seasons hotel, so she could belt back there to be alone with her new iPhone as soon as she bought it. And she’s not some geeky kid. This cotcase is a 38 year old manager.

The guy at the head of the same parade of marketing victims - a 36 year old business analyst - intended to delay gratification: “The first thing I’m going to do when I get it is go home and put it on charge and go to bed. It will wait until the morning - all that matters is that I’ve got the phone.”

Is this a bloody phone they’re referring to, or a sex toy? Jaisus!

When these bozos’ batteries run low and they review their dial tone of a life, are they going to look back on that moment when they first took possession of their iPhone 3G as revelatory? As their mortal coil begins to slip away like a thief in the night of eternity, are they going to feel for a final time the sweet touch of those buttons as they made their first call on their new iPhone, hear again the voice of the privileged friend at the other end full of the false cheer of camouflaged envy at the news of their purchasing triumph?

Or are they already scanning the future for the next big THING?

The downside of this constant veneration of the trivial is that the void will always be there. The upside is there’ll always be something to fill it. Like this breaking news headline that greeted me first thing when I booted up the computer this morning: “World Waits For Brangelina Twins Photos”. O still my beating heart…

Sunday Rose - A Missed Patriotic Opportunity

Popular Culture, Society, movies No Comments

Tosser of tossers, Chris Martin, has defended N & K’s unusual choice of name for their thankfully-finally-delivered bundle, opining that “Chewbacca” would have been an equally fine choice. In fact, he declares, Chewbacca’s “no stranger than Sarah“. (Tell that to lil’ Chewbacca when she limps home bawling from primary school slapped around by the other kiddies with her hair pulled every which way in recognition of her singular moniker).

This is not an easy thing to admit, but Chrisso got me thinking…

If anything goes with yer kids’ names, and mindful of Nic’s constant assurances from the shores of America that Oz is her home and always will be even if she stays the fuck away most of her life but that’s really not how she wants things to be cos Oz is the best country in the world and she can’t wait to come back you know because the people are just so down to earth and she misses the unique Aussie humour and Mum and Dad and Sis and the azure skies and the wide brown land girt by sea gleaming with a thousand dyes (or is it a thousand eyes - or even better, since we’re channeling Nic, a thousand I’s?) and she’s so proud to be Aussie and always will be etc…surely she’s missed an outstanding opportunity to display her patriotism in a truly meaningful and indelible way. Sunday Rose? WHY NOT SUNDAY ROAST?

No conviction, Nic.

Pedo Pawn

Modern Marketing, Popular Culture, Society 2 Comments

This is a PS to yesterday’s post.

My comments yesterday notwithstanding, I found it galling to watch the Art Monthly Australia cover kid at the centre of the current “controversy”, Olympia Nelson, now 11 years old, mouthing off in earnest defence of the publishing of her 6 year old naked form as art and claiming she was “really, really offended by what Kevin Rudd had to say” about her picture. (For those who came in late, Rudd has been variously quoted as stating that he “can’t stand” and “hated” the picture…which means that the ALP marketing gurus have divined a positive electoral response to the PM’s moral posturing on the Henson naked pubescent pics and told him to keep up the good work).

It seemed pretty obvious, watching Olympia gushing out adult phrasing during her TV interview last night, that she’d been well schooled in what to say. Daddy (Robert Nelson) loomed over her with the air of a minder/mentor, ready to correct her, it seemed, at the slightest sign of departure from the script. Nelson, who works as art critic for The Age,
presented in flamboyant attire - garish shirt and ridiculous bloated bow tie - that shouted “artist, art critic, arty, bohemian, coolest daddy on the block”. All so…managed. And if not, what a fucking poseur. Read the rest…

Peds Under The Bed! Yesterday Henson, Today…

Modern Marketing, Political, Society 2 Comments

Pedophilia is to now what “commos” were to the 50s. And as with the 50s, McCarthyist paranoia and obsession abounds. Only difference is, it ain’t reds being spied under the beds of the nation - it’s peds!

Any herd obsession is, naturally, fed off and promulgated by political leaders anxious to be seen to be banging the drum of the righteous and morally decent. With the Henson controversy barely into rigamortis after police charges of indecency were thrown out, we have a new pedo outrage to deal with: the latest Art Monthly Australia magazine features nude shots of a little girl snapped by her mother.

In one, at 4 years old, she is shown wearing her grandmother’s jewellery. In another, “perhaps the most provocative” according to a Sydney Morning Herald online report, she “lies back with her arms behind her head and her legs folded.” Interesting, the mindset of the reporter that is betrayed by this wording. Firstly, by whose judgment are any of the pictures “provocative”? Secondly, how can a 4 year old girl be provocative? That’s just not possible. Provocation requires wilful intent, which leaves only the photographer - the girl’s mother - as the guilty party. Her art critic husband, Robert Nelson, dispels that with his comment that the photos were instigated by his daughter and that “her mother saw nothing wrong with making them.”

The cover of the magazine shows the subject at 6 years old against a backdrop alluding to the work of Lewis Carroll. Here it is:

Art Monthly cover

Is there anything remotely provocative about that picture? 20 years ago, before all this pedo obsession nonsense started, it could have featured on one of those tins of biscuits some old lady from England used to send your family for Christmas. But NOW…well, the pollies are scrabbling for front baying position as they decry this affont to public standards of decency. Hark at this… Read the rest…

Paul Murray - Journo, Judge, Jury

Society No Comments

Have a look at the following promo that graced the West’s online home page for most of last week.

Paul Murray promo

As I confessed in the Comments section of my previous post, I am a bit of a trash TV tragic. So yes, I did watch Nine’s 4 hour special “Schapelle Corby - The Hidden Truth” (I really didn’t mean to, honest, but you’re sitting there channel surfing waiting for the program you really want to watch to come on and make the mistake of lingering more than 2 minutes, and next thing you know the hook is set and you’re there for the long trashy haul).

My expectation was of a lot of padding and puff, and Nine delivered. Their promo promise to finally expose the “hidden truth” about Corby’s innocence or guilt was, of course, guff. We did get more detail on the main players in this unfortunate tragic-comedy, but “the truth” consisted of an implication by a crim that he knew how the dope ended up in Shapelle’s boogie board bag, but wouldn’t be telling until all legal obstacles were out of the way (which, it transpires, included a spell in the clink by said crim for drug-trafficking).

So, I wondered, what’s Murray on about? Surely he’s not judging Schapelle guilty on the basis of Nine’s crappy doco? Read the rest…

Sixty Minutes’ “Little Women” - A Comedy in Three Acts

Modern Marketing, Popular Culture, Society, Uncategorized, tv 6 Comments

On 60 Minutes last night, we had some dippy professor, Louise Newman, asserting in relation to the Henson photographs that it is irrelevant whether the artist was intentionally eroticising his images or not, but that “if one paedophile views those images as sexually arousing and that encourages them in their behaviour, then we have a serious problem.”

This twit is head of Child Psychiatry at Newcastle University. Which doesn’t say much for the standards of academe in Newcastle, or, perhaps, for the affirmative action policy that - surely! - put the good prof in her seat. Read the rest…

Here Are The Henson Pictures - But A Dilemma Remains

Political, Popular Culture, Society 6 Comments

I left my position on the Henson pics dangling in my last post, concluding with a serve at the nanny state for confiscating the offending items and locking them away in a high cupboard where the kiddies couldn’t get at them.

Subsequently, a commenter provided a link to some of the pics of Bill Henson’s that are at the centre of all the fuss (thanks, Lyn). So, nanny state subverted by the lawless Web (bleearrgh!), here’s what all the fuss is about:

Henson picture 1

Henson pic 2Henson pic 5Henson pic 3

(click to enlarge)
Read the rest…

Pedophilia – Or Pedophilia Phobia?

Political, Popular Culture, Society 14 Comments

Just what do you make of the raid by police on the Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery in Sydney and confiscation of 21 photographs immediately prior to the opening of an exhibition by internationally renowned artist Bill Henson? Or the stated intention to bring obscenity charges against, presumably, the artist and gallery?

When the State starts brandishing the Arts censorship cudgel my reaction is usually reflexive and unequivocal condemnation. I say ‘usually’, because there are some cases that challenge the validity of a black and white stance on censorship. Freedom of artistic expression is vital to any society that calls itself democratic – except, I’d argue, where that freedom erodes democratic principles and/or the founding laws that uphold them.

In snuff movies, for example, the lives of those who involuntarily ‘star’ in them are extinguished – who but a fellow psychopath would march under placards of protest in defence of a director who claimed artistic license to murder? In my own rhetorical interests, this example is about as extreme as it gets. However, while I have not heard of any recent defence of snuff movies as ‘art’, the historical precedent exists in literature.

I refer to the works of the Marquis De Sade. Sade is said to have pushed the boundaries of hedonistic libertarianism to torturing and killing prostitutes for sexual gratification, and to have drawn on this experience in his pornographic writings. Read the rest…

Happy Birthday From Who?

Popular Culture, Society 4 Comments

Yeah yeah, I know it should be “from whom“. This is the web, baby. Where you write emails in smaller case without punctuation, don’t start with the name of the person you’re emailing (seems rude to me…sorta like addressing someone you know well with “Oi you!”), and don’t put your name at the end (also seems rude - but that’s web etiquette).

Lookin’ at yas over a half-full glass, ’twas me birthday a few days back, and I’m thrilled to report that I received more birthday greetings this year - 7 - than I can remember receiving before (that covers the last 8 - 10 years, I suspect…you never can be sure exactly when that short-term memory mule kicks in). One was via Facebook, the rest emailed. And 4 were from sources I am only vaguely familiar with: Wishlist, Birthday Alarm, Astrology.com and Web2mail. Must have signed up with them some time. None sent presents, but it’s the thought that counts.

Cheers.

The Birthday Boy

Troy Buswell Quokka Soccer Blogger A Flogger

Perth, Political, Society 5 Comments

For those who have not bothered to google for the blog where the Troy Buswell quokka-kicking rumour originated, click here for the home page of the offending blogger, Matt Hayden.

Further down in my post (in blue) I’ve published in its sorry entirety this wanker’s stupid and thuggish quokka-soccer post incriminating Buswell, but for those who want to see it in its original context, it can be accessed here.

I am an active blogger, have long supported and promoted the cause of the citizen journo, and look upon the mainstream media with general disdain (and the Libs, for that matter). Going by the content and general timbre of his posts, the same applies to Matt Hayden.

But he has undermined the credibility of bloggers everywhere with his Buswell quokka post, which amounts to an act of blogging vandalism. The most outrageous instances of foul play can sometimes be saved by humour – sometimes - but Hayden’s quokka post was not remotely funny as it was written, and I do not believe it was intended to be. The tone of the post gave no indication that it was tongue-in-cheek as Hayden is now claiming. Read the rest…

« Previous Entries